↓ Skip to main content

Gastrointestinal Pathology in Celiac Disease

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Pathology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastrointestinal Pathology in Celiac Disease
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Pathology, July 2012
DOI 10.1309/ajcpe89zpvjtspwl
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian S. Brown, Jason Smith, Christophe Rosty

Abstract

The main histologic feature of celiac disease is increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with or without villous atrophy of the duodenal mucosa. The aim of this study was to document a broad range of additional morphologic changes in intestinal mucosa biopsy specimens from patients with celiac disease. Our cohort comprised 150 patients with positive tissue transglutaminase serologic findings; 7 were at Corazza stage A1, 58 at stage B1, and 85 at stage B2. IEL counts per 100 epithelial cells ranged from 34 to 156 (mean, 88.6); a significant neutrophilic infiltrate was present in 85 cases (56.7%); eosinophil count ranged from 3 to 50 per high-power field (mean, 14.6). Additional findings included morphologic changes in enterocytes in 68.7%, subepithelial collagen thickening in 45.3%, and associated lymphocytic gastritis in 30.4% of patients. We demonstrated that these underrecognized features, which can be misleading, are not uncommon in celiac disease and were positively associated with more advanced stages of the disease (P < .0001).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,023,426
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#960
of 3,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,983
of 177,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.