↓ Skip to main content

Who Suffers More from Job Insecurity? A Meta‐Analytic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychology: An International Review, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
757 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
720 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Who Suffers More from Job Insecurity? A Meta‐Analytic Review
Published in
Applied Psychology: An International Review, November 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00312.x
Authors

H.‐L. Cheng, Darius K.‐S. Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 720 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 700 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 145 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 14%
Student > Bachelor 77 11%
Researcher 49 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 126 18%
Unknown 177 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 194 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 170 24%
Social Sciences 71 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 3%
Other 43 6%
Unknown 196 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,131,127
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychology: An International Review
#127
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,685
of 165,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychology: An International Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.