↓ Skip to main content

The Macroecology of Sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
62 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
5 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Macroecology of Sustainability
Published in
PLoS Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph R. Burger, Craig D. Allen, James H. Brown, William R. Burnside, Ana D. Davidson, Trevor S. Fristoe, Marcus J. Hamilton, Norman Mercado-Silva, Jeffrey C. Nekola, Jordan G. Okie, Wenyun Zuo

Abstract

The discipline of sustainability science has emerged in response to concerns of natural and social scientists, policymakers, and lay people about whether the Earth can continue to support human population growth and economic prosperity. Yet, sustainability science has developed largely independently from and with little reference to key ecological principles that govern life on Earth. A macroecological perspective highlights three principles that should be integral to sustainability science: 1) physical conservation laws govern the flows of energy and materials between human systems and the environment, 2) smaller systems are connected by these flows to larger systems in which they are embedded, and 3) global constraints ultimately limit flows at smaller scales. Over the past few decades, decreasing per capita rates of consumption of petroleum, phosphate, agricultural land, fresh water, fish, and wood indicate that the growing human population has surpassed the capacity of the Earth to supply enough of these essential resources to sustain even the current population and level of socioeconomic development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 4%
Brazil 8 2%
Mexico 7 1%
France 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 439 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 114 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 19%
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Professor 30 6%
Other 90 18%
Unknown 48 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 38%
Environmental Science 146 29%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Engineering 12 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 69 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#533,602
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,046
of 9,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,529
of 178,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.