| Title |
Doctors'non-verbal behaviour in consultations: look at the patient before you look at the computer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp10x482293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Silverman, Paul Kinnersley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,240,551
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#614
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,794
of 164,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.