↓ Skip to main content

扁平足がモノフィラメント圧痛計による足底感覚閾値に与える影響

Overview of attention for article published in Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 291)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
扁平足がモノフィラメント圧痛計による足底感覚閾値に与える影響
Published in
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2016
DOI 10.1589/rika.31.893
Authors

高田 雄一, 矢崎 香苗, 岩本 浩二, 飯島 光博, 又村 貴大, 山本 可奈子, 宮本 重範

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#22
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,397
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.