↓ Skip to main content

Using value of information to prioritize research needs for migratory bird management under climate change: a case study using federal land acquisition in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using value of information to prioritize research needs for migratory bird management under climate change: a case study using federal land acquisition in the United States
Published in
Biological Reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1111/brv.12602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clark S. Rushing, Madeleine Rubenstein, James E. Lyons, Michael C. Runge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Environmental Science 9 17%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,994,525
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#474
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,890
of 378,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.