| Title |
Impact of a multidimensional infection control strategy on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in the adult intensive care units of 15 developing countries: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-012-0278-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. D. Rosenthal, S. K. Todi, C. Álvarez-Moreno, M. Pawar, A. Karlekar, A. A. Zeggwagh, Z. Mitrev, F. E. Udwadia, J. A. Navoa-Ng, M. Chakravarthy, R. Salomao, S. Sahu, A. Dilek, S. S. Kanj, H. Guanche-Garcell, L. E. Cuéllar, G. Ersoz, A. Nevzat-Yalcin, N. Jaggi, E. A. Medeiros, G. Ye, Ö. A. Akan, T. Mapp, A. Castañeda-Sabogal, L. Matta-Cortés, F. Sirmatel, N. Olarte, H. Torres-Hernández, N. Barahona-Guzmán, R. Fernández-Hidalgo, W. Villamil-Gómez, D. Sztokhamer, S. Forciniti, R. Berba, H. Turgut, C. Bin, Y. Yang, I. Pérez-Serrato, C. E. Lastra, S. Singh, D. Ozdemir, S. Ulusoy, INICC Members |
| Abstract |
We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multidimensional infection control strategy for the reduction of the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in patients hospitalized in adult intensive care units (AICUs) of hospitals which are members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC), from 40 cities of 15 developing countries: Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, India, Lebanon, Macedonia, Mexico, Morocco, Panama, Peru, Philippines, and Turkey. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#960
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,677
of 164,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.