↓ Skip to main content

Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris)

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,521)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris)
Published in
Ecotoxicology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10646-012-0927-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Laycock, Kate M. Lenthall, Andrew T. Barratt, James E. Cresswell

Abstract

Bumble bees are important pollinators whose populations have declined over recent years, raising widespread concern. One conspicuous threat to bumble bees is their unintended exposure to trace residues of systemic neonicotinoid pesticides, such as imidacloprid, which are ingested when bees forage on the nectar and pollen of treated crops. However, the demographic consequences for bumble bees of exposure to dietary neonicotinoids have yet to be fully established. To determine whether environmentally realistic levels of imidacloprid are capable of making a demographic impact on bumble bees, we exposed queenless microcolonies of worker bumble bees, Bombus terrestris, to a range of dosages of dietary imidacloprid between zero and 125 μg L(-1) and examined the effects on ovary development and fecundity. Microcolonies showed a dose-dependent decline in fecundity, with environmentally realistic dosages in the range of 1 μg L(-1) capable of reducing brood production by one third. In contrast, ovary development was unimpaired by dietary imidacloprid except at the highest dosage. Imidacloprid reduced feeding on both syrup and pollen but, after controlling statistically for dosage, microcolonies that consumed more syrup and pollen produced more brood. We therefore speculate that the detrimental effects of imidacloprid on fecundity emerge principally from nutrient limitation imposed by the failure of individuals to feed. Our findings raise concern about the impact of neonicotinoids on wild bumble bee populations. However, we recognize that to fully evaluate impacts on wild colonies it will be necessary to establish the effect of dietary neonicotinoids on the fecundity of bumble bee queens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 343 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 16%
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Student > Master 58 16%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 4%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 56 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 190 53%
Environmental Science 49 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Chemistry 9 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 66 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#869,873
of 24,053,881 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#16
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,572
of 167,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,053,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.