↓ Skip to main content

Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?
Published in
Public Choice, July 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00130405
Authors

Michael L. Davis, Michael Ferrantino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 2 5%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 32%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 36%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#1,043
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,247
of 29,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.