↓ Skip to main content

Stress, Coping, and Circadian Disruption Among Women Awaiting Breast Cancer Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Stress, Coping, and Circadian Disruption Among Women Awaiting Breast Cancer Surgery
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9352-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Dedert, Elizabeth Lush, Anees Chagpar, Firdaus S. Dhabhar, Suzanne C. Segerstrom, David Spiegel, Ehab Dayyat, Meagan Daup, Kelly McMasters, Sandra E. Sephton

Abstract

Psychological distress and coping related to a breast cancer diagnosis can profoundly affect psychological adjustment, possibly resulting in the disruption of circadian rest/activity and cortisol rhythms, which are prognostic for early mortality in metastatic colorectal and breast cancers, respectively. This study aims to explore the relationships of cancer-specific distress and avoidant coping with rest/activity and cortisol rhythm disruption in the period between diagnosis and breast cancer surgery. Fifty-seven presurgical breast cancer patients provided daily self-reports of cancer-specific distress and avoidant coping as well as actigraphic and salivary cortisol data. Distress and avoidant coping were related to rest/activity rhythm disruption (daytime sedentariness, inconsistent rhythms). Patients with disrupted rest/activity cycles had flattened diurnal cortisol rhythms. Maladaptive psychological responses to breast cancer diagnosis were associated with disruption of circadian rest/activity rhythms. Given that circadian cycles regulate tumor growth, we need greater understanding of possible psychosocial effects in cancer-related circadian disruption.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,909,286
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#220
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,793
of 160,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.