| Title |
Optimal Timing of Intervention in NSTE-ACS Without Pre-Treatment The EARLY Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gilles Lemesle, Marc Laine, Mathieu Pankert, Ziad Boueri, Pascal Motreff, Franck Paganelli, Karine Baumstarck, Antoine Roch, François Kerbaul, Etienne Puymirat, Laurent Bonello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 73% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#979,788
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#343
of 4,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,843
of 397,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#8
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.