↓ Skip to main content

Psychopathological profile of patients with different forms of bruxism

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Psychopathological profile of patients with different forms of bruxism
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00784-010-0492-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gurkan Rasit Bayar, Recep Tutuncu, Cengizhan Acikel

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of psychopathological symptoms in patients who self-reported different forms of bruxism by means of clinical and anamnestic diagnostic criteria. Eighty-five participants were divided into four groups as sleep bruxers (12), awake bruxers (24), sleep-awake bruxers (33), and non-bruxers (16). A self-report symptom inventory questionnaire (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)) was filled out by all groups to determine their psychopathological symptoms. As regards mean psychopathological scores, patients with sleep-awake bruxism endorsed the highest scores. In addition, patients with awake bruxism showed higher scores than patients with sleep bruxism and non-bruxism in most SCL-90-R subscales. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences between groups in any of the SCL-90-R subscales, except for the psychoticism subscale. Mann-Whitney test followed by Bonferroni's test correction between non-bruxer and sleep-awake bruxer groups revealed significant differences in depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, global severity index, positive symptom distress index, and positive symptom total in all SCL-90-R subscales. Statistical analysis of our study showed that differences between groups were significant in all SCL-90-R subscales except for the psychoticism subscale. Better distinction of bruxism forms may help to develop new treatment strategies for bruxism disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 43%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,659,617
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#751
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,679
of 180,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.