| Title |
Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-012-9258-1 |
| Authors |
Ton de Jong, Armin Weinberger, Isabelle Girault, Anders Kluge, Ard W. Lazonder, Margus Pedaste, Sten Ludvigsen, Muriel Ney, Barbara Wasson, Astrid Wichmann, Caspar Geraedts, Adam Giemza, Tasos Hovardas, Rachel Julien, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Anne Lejeune, Constantinos C. Manoli, Yuri Matteman, Tago Sarapuu, Alex Verkade, Vibeke Vold, Zacharias C. Zacharia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 26% |
| Unknown | 23 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 77 | 40% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#335
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,513
of 149,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.