You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biogeography and phylogeny of masting: do global patterns fit functional hypotheses?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.16617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian S. Pearse, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Michael Lordon, Andrew L. Hipp, Walter D. Koenig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Portugal | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 11 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 25% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 27% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,225,054
of 25,126,845 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#2,248
of 9,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,951
of 391,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#73
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,126,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.