↓ Skip to main content

Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effective dose

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effective dose
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9728-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Cordovani, Mrinalini Balki, Dan Farine, Gareth Seaward, Jose C. A. Carvalho

Abstract

The primary objective of our study was to determine the minimum intravenous dose of carbetocin required to produce adequate uterine contraction in 95% of women (effective dose [ED](95)) undergoing elective Cesarean delivery (CD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 43 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 46 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,442,648
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#999
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,171
of 177,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.