↓ Skip to main content

Managing drug resistance in cancer: lessons from HIV therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
86 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing drug resistance in cancer: lessons from HIV therapy
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/nrc3297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Bock, Thomas Lengauer

Abstract

Drug resistance is a common cause of treatment failure for HIV infection and cancer. The high mutation rate of HIV leads to genetic heterogeneity among viral populations and provides the seed from which drug-resistant clones emerge in response to therapy. Similarly, most cancers are characterized by extensive genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional and cellular diversity, and drug-resistant cancer cells outgrow their non-resistant peers in a process of somatic evolution. Patient-specific combination of antiviral drugs has emerged as a powerful approach for treating drug-resistant HIV infection, using genotype-based predictions to identify the best matched combination therapy among several hundred possible combinations of HIV drugs. In this Opinion article, we argue that HIV therapy provides a 'blueprint' for designing and validating patient-specific combination therapies in cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Austria 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 238 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 28%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Engineering 15 6%
Chemistry 14 5%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 31 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,233,303
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#1,005
of 2,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,807
of 168,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#9
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.