↓ Skip to main content

Superficial Mycoses Associated with Diaper Dermatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Mycopathologia, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Superficial Mycoses Associated with Diaper Dermatitis
Published in
Mycopathologia, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11046-016-0020-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandro Bonifaz, Rubí Rojas, Andrés Tirado-Sánchez, Dinora Chávez-López, Carlos Mena, Luz Calderón, Ponce-Olivera Rosa María

Abstract

Diapers create particular conditions of moisture and friction, and with urine and feces come increased pH and irritating enzymes (lipases and proteases). Fungi can take advantage of all these factors. Candida yeasts, especially C. albicans, are responsible for the most frequent secondary infections and are isolated in more than 80 % of cases. Correct diagnosis is important for ensuring the correct prescription of topical antimycotics. Nystatin, imidazoles and ciclopirox are effective. It is important to realize there are resistant strains. Dermatophytes can infect the diaper area, with the most common agent being Epidermophyton floccosum. The clinical characteristics of dermatophytosis are different from those of candidiasis, and it can be diagnosed and treated simply. Malassezia yeasts can aggravate conditions affecting the diaper area, such as seborrheic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and inverse psoriasis. Additional treatment is recommended in this case, because they usually involve complement activation and increased specific IgE levels. Erythrasma is a pseudomycosis that is indistinguishable from candidiasis and may also occur in large skin folds. It is treated with topical antibacterial products and some antimycotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 45 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,328,845
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#882
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,062
of 334,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.