↓ Skip to main content

Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uschi Cop, Nicolas Dirix, Denis Drieghe, Wouter Duyck, Cop, Uschi, Dirix, Nicolas, Drieghe, Denis, Duyck, Wouter

Abstract

This article introduces GECO, the Ghent Eye-Tracking Corpus, a monolingual and bilingual corpus of the eyetracking data of participants reading a complete novel. English monolinguals and Dutch-English bilinguals read an entire novel, which was presented in paragraphs on the screen. The bilinguals read half of the novel in their first language, and the other half in their second language. In this article, we describe the distributions and descriptive statistics of the most important reading time measures for the two groups of participants. This large eyetracking corpus is perfectly suited for both exploratory purposes and more directed hypothesis testing, and it can guide the formulation of ideas and theories about naturalistic reading processes in a meaningful context. Most importantly, this corpus has the potential to evaluate the generalizability of monolingual and bilingual language theories and models to the reading of long texts and narratives. The corpus is freely available at http://expsy.ugent.be/downloads/geco .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 27 22%
Psychology 26 21%
Computer Science 12 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 42 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,896,290
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#964
of 2,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,848
of 349,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.