You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma of Early Childhood: Results From the Prospective Clinical Trial HIT-2000 and An Extended Validation Cohort.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.19.03057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Mynarek, Katja von Hoff, Torsten Pietsch, Holger Ottensmeier, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Brigitte Bison, Stefan Pfister, Andrey Korshunov, Tanvi Sharma, Natalie Jaeger, Marina Ryzhova, Olga Zheludkova, Andrey Golanov, Elisabeth Jane Rushing, Martin Hasselblatt, Arend Koch, Ulrich Schüller, Andreas von Deimling, Felix Sahm, Martin Sill, Markus J Riemenschneider, Hildegard Dohmen, Camelia Maria Monoranu, Clemens Sommer, Ori Staszewski, Christian Mawrin, Jens Schittenhelm, Wolfgang Brück, Katharina Filipski, Christian Hartmann, Matthias Meinhardt, Klaus Pietschmann, Christine Haberler, Irene Slavc, Nicolas U Gerber, Michael Grotzer, Martin Benesch, Paul Gerhardt Schlegel, Frank Deinlein, André O von Bueren, Carsten Friedrich, Björn-Ole Juhnke, Denise Obrecht, Gudrun Fleischhack, Robert Kwiecien, Andreas Faldum, Rolf Dieter Kortmann, Marcel Kool, Stefan Rutkowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,659,266
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#4,053
of 22,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,189
of 405,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#94
of 780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.