| Title |
Tracking Down the Anatomy of the Left Bundle Branch to Optimize Left Bundle Branch Pacing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Case Reports, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José-Ángel Cabrera, Andreu Porta-Sánchez, Roderick Tung, Damián Sánchez-Quintana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 18% |
| Spain | 14 | 8% |
| Mexico | 10 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 64 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 132 | 71% |
| Scientists | 24 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 43% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#361,635
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#25
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,620
of 408,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#6
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.