You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Real-time safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines in children, Australia, 2015.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Eurosurveillance, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2015.20.43.30050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexis Pillsbury, Patrick Cashman, Alan Leeb, Annette Regan, Darren Westphal, Tom Snelling, Christopher Blyth, Nigel Crawford, Nicholas Wood, Kristine Macartney |
| Abstract |
Increased febrile reactions in Australian children from one influenza vaccine brand in 2010 diminished confidence in influenza immunisation, highlighting the need for improved vaccine safety surveillance. AusVaxSafety, a national vaccine safety surveillance system collected adverse events in young children for 2015 influenza vaccine brands in real time through parent/carer reports via SMS/email. Weekly cumulative data on 3,340 children demonstrated low rates of fever (4.4%) and medical attendance (1.1%). Fever was more frequent with concomitant vaccination. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Eurosurveillance
#1,892
of 3,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,451
of 295,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eurosurveillance
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.