↓ Skip to main content

Science, Human Nature, and a New Paradigm for Ethics Education

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Science, Human Nature, and a New Paradigm for Ethics Education
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11948-012-9373-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Lampe

Abstract

For centuries, religion and philosophy have been the primary basis for efforts to guide humans to be more ethical. However, training in ethics and religion and imparting positive values and morality tests such as those emanating from the categorical imperative and the Golden Rule have not been enough to protect humankind from its bad behaviors. To improve ethics education educators must better understand aspects of human nature such as those that lead to "self-deception" and "personal bias." Through rationalizations, faulty reasoning and hidden bias, individuals trick themselves into believing there is little wrong with their own unethical behavior. The application of science to human nature offers the possibility of improving ethics education through better self-knowledge. The author recommends a new paradigm for ethics education in contemporary modern society. This includes the creation of a new field called "applied evolutionary neuro-ethics" which integrates science and social sciences to improve ethics education. The paradigm can merge traditional thinking about ethics from religious and philosophical perspectives with new ideas from applied evolutionary neuro-ethics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 24%
Arts and Humanities 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Philosophy 2 7%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 4 14%