↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00360-012-0676-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig R. White, Michael R. Kearney

Abstract

Basal metabolic rate (BMR) is the rate of metabolism of a resting, postabsorptive, non-reproductive, adult bird or mammal, measured during the inactive circadian phase at a thermoneutral temperature. BMR is one of the most widely measured physiological traits, and data are available for over 1,200 species. With data available for such a wide range of species, BMR is a benchmark measurement in ecological and evolutionary physiology, and is often used as a reference against which other levels of metabolism are compared. Implicit in such comparisons is the assumption that BMR is invariant for a given species and that it therefore represents a stable point of comparison. However, BMR shows substantial variation between individuals, populations and species. Investigation of the ultimate (evolutionary) explanations for these differences remains an active area of inquiry, and explanation of size-related trends remains a contentious area. Whereas explanations for the scaling of BMR are generally mechanistic and claim ties to the first principles of chemistry and physics, investigations of mass-independent variation typically take an evolutionary perspective and have demonstrated that BMR is ultimately linked with a range of extrinsic variables including diet, habitat temperature, and net primary productivity. Here we review explanations for size-related and mass-independent variation in the BMR of animals, and suggest ways that the various explanations can be evaluated and integrated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Norway 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 274 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 26%
Researcher 49 17%
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Professor 13 4%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 41 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 53%
Environmental Science 34 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#21,866,582
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#744
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,818
of 174,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.