You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mast seeding patterns are asynchronous at a continental scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41477-020-0647-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jalene M. LaMontagne, Ian S. Pearse, David F. Greene, Walter D. Koenig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 34% |
| Canada | 11 | 15% |
| Portugal | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 52% |
| Scientists | 31 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#762,397
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#450
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,665
of 408,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#22
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.