↓ Skip to main content

Olea europaea leaf extract alters microRNA expression in human glioblastoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Olea europaea leaf extract alters microRNA expression in human glioblastoma cells
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00432-012-1261-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berrin Tunca, Gulcin Tezcan, Gulsah Cecener, Unal Egeli, Secil Ak, Hulusi Malyer, Gulendam Tumen, Ayhan Bilir

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and the most lethal form of primary malignant tumors in the central nervous system. There is an increasing need for the development of more efficient therapeutic approaches for the treatment of these patients. One of the most attractive cancer therapy methods to date is the induction of tumor cell death by certain phytochemicals. Interestingly, bioactive compounds have been shown to alter micro RNA (miRNA) expression involved in several biological processes at the posttranscriptional level. The present study aimed to evaluate whether Olea europaea leaf extract (OLE) has an anticancer effect and modulates miRNA expression in GBM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,709,804
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#248
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,363
of 165,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.