↓ Skip to main content

Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11160-004-3151-x
Authors

Tim Dempster, Marc Taquet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
France 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 243 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 24%
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 45%
Environmental Science 57 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 53 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#257
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,969
of 60,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.