↓ Skip to main content

Guaranteed violation of a Bell inequality without aligned reference frames or calibrated devices

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guaranteed violation of a Bell inequality without aligned reference frames or calibrated devices
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Shadbolt, Tamás Vértesi, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Brunner, Jeremy L. O'Brien

Abstract

Bell tests - the experimental demonstration of a Bell inequality violation - are central to understanding the foundations of quantum mechanics, and are a powerful diagnostic tool for the development of quantum technologies. To date, Bell tests have relied on careful calibration of measurement devices and alignment of a shared reference frame between two parties - both technically demanding tasks. We show that neither of these operations are necessary, violating Bell inequalities (i) with certainty using unaligned, but calibrated, measurement devices, and (ii) with near-certainty using uncalibrated and unaligned devices. We demonstrate generic quantum nonlocality with randomly chosen measurements on a singlet state of two photons, implemented using a reconfigurable integrated optical waveguide circuit. The observed results demonstrate the robustness of our schemes to imperfections and statistical noise. This approach is likely to have important applications both in fundamental science and quantum technologies, including device-independent quantum key distribution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 34%
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 35 70%
Computer Science 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,614,838
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#38,223
of 122,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,304
of 164,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#68
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.