↓ Skip to main content

The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: The accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: The accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10995-012-1065-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather B. Clayton, William M. Sappenfield, Elizabeth Gulitz, Charles S. Mahan, Donna J. Petersen, Kara M. Stanley, Hamisu M. Salihu

Abstract

(1) Assess the accuracy of public health data sources used to investigate primary late preterm cesarean delivery (PLPCD) and (2) compare differences in data accuracy by hospital PLPCD rate classification. This analysis uses data from the Florida Investigation of Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery (FILPCD), an investigation of singleton, PLPCD's that occurred from 2006 to 2007 in hospitals classified with either a low or high PLPCD rate (high rate 39.4-58.3 %, low rate 11.9-25.1 %). Three data sources were validated with maternal medical records: birth certificates, hospital discharge data, and combined birth certificate and hospital discharge data. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa values were calculated. A summary measure of kappa values was compared by hospital PLPCD rate classification using the paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. Large variations in accuracy of data elements were found by hospital PLPCD rate classification, with low PLPCD rate hospitals demonstrating higher overall data accuracy. The summary measure of agreement was significantly higher for low PLPCD rate hospitals compared to high PLPCD rate hospitals (0.60 vs. 0.50, p < 0.01). Accurate estimates of CD and late preterm birth are vital for public health practitioners and policy makers who seek to address the growing concern over recent increases in CD and late preterm birth. Understanding the potential for systematic differences in reporting accuracy by hospital PLPCD rate is important to data quality improvement efforts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,129,965
of 25,097,836 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#824
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,026
of 169,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,097,836 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.