↓ Skip to main content

Kelp as a trophic resource for marine suspension feeders: a review of isotope-based evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Kelp as a trophic resource for marine suspension feeders: a review of isotope-based evidence
Published in
Marine Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00227-012-1929-2
Authors

Robert J. Miller, Henry M. Page

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 5 3%
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 151 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 51%
Environmental Science 38 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 25 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,147,011
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#2,586
of 3,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,517
of 160,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.