| Title |
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Lemor, Mir B. Basir, Kirit Patel, Brian Kolski, Amir Kaki, Navin K. Kapur, Robert Riley, John Finley, Andrew Goldsweig, Herbert D. Aronow, P. Matthew Belford, Behnam Tehrani, Alexander G. Truesdell, David Lasorda, Aditya Bharadwaj, Ivan Hanson, Thomas LaLonde, Sarah Gorgis, William O'Neill, Alejandro Lemor, Mir B. Basir, William W. O'Neill, Kirit Patel, Brian Kolski, Theodore Schreiber, Amir Kaki, Behnam Tehrani, Alexander G. Truesdell, David Lasorda, Aditya Bharadwaj, Ivan Hanson, Steve Almany, Steven Timmis, Simon Dixon, Thomas Lalonde, Antonious Attallah, Josh Todd, Steve Marso, Charles Wilkins, Nainesh Patel, Shaun Senter, Thomas McRae, Ayaz Rahman, Joseph Gelormini, Navin Kapur, Inder M. Singh, Robert Riley, Brian O'Neill, Tijuan Overly, Rahul Sharma, Allison Dupont, Michael Green, Michael Lim, Matheen Khuddus, Christopher Caputo, Timothy Larkin, Raza Askari, Steve Marso, Ali Nsair, Yasir Akhtar, Ivan Hanson, Lang Lin, David McAllister, John Finley, Andrew Goldsweig, James Park, Simon Gorwara, Raja Nazir, Scott Martin, Malcolm Foster, Craig Smith, Chandhiran Rangaswamy, Omer Zuberi, Robert Federici, John Baker, Ian Cawich, Denes Korpas, Nalin Srivastava, Herbert D. Aronow, Michael Schaeffer, David Wohns, P. Matthew Belford, Aditya Mehra, Nimrod Blank, M. Chadi Alraies, Michael Ashbrook, Osama Abdel-Hafez, Akshay Khandelwal, Khaldoon Alaswad, Sarah Gorgis, Tyrell Johnson, Michael Hacala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 52% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 69% |
| Scientists | 11 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#920,978
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#305
of 4,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,203
of 408,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#11
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.