↓ Skip to main content

Every Large Point Set contains Many Collinear Points or an Empty Pentagon

Overview of attention for article published in Graphs and Combinatorics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 154)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Every Large Point Set contains Many Collinear Points or an Empty Pentagon
Published in
Graphs and Combinatorics, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00373-010-0957-2
Authors

Zachary Abel, Brad Ballinger, Prosenjit Bose, Sébastien Collette, Vida Dujmović, Ferran Hurtado, Scott Duke Kominers, Stefan Langerman, Attila Pór, David R. Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Librarian 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Graphs and Combinatorics
#10
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,352
of 101,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graphs and Combinatorics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them