| Title |
Emotional Reactivity and Internalizing Symptoms: Moderating Role of Emotion Regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Therapy and Research, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10608-015-9722-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin G. Shapero, Lyn Y. Abramson, Lauren B. Alloy |
| Abstract |
Emotion dysregulation has been associated with increases in many forms of psychopathology in adolescents and adults. The development of effective emotion regulation skills is important during adolescence, especially as stressful life events increase during this time. The current study examined two emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal and affective suppression, in interaction with self-report and biological measures of emotional reactivity as predictors of internalizing symptoms. A community sample of adolescents (n = 127), at an age of risk for depression and anxiety, completed self-report measures of emotional reactivity and internalizing symptoms. In addition, they completed a modified social stress task and were assessed on biological measures of reactivity and regulation. Findings suggested that the trait tendency to reappraise was associated with a reduced impact of emotional reactivity on depressive, but not anxiety symptoms. Implications for shared and specific aspects of emotional reactivity and regulation are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 105 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2016.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#780
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,345
of 278,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.