↓ Skip to main content

The Set-Point Theory of Well-Being: Negative Results and Consequent Revisions

Overview of attention for article published in Social Indicators Research, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
The Set-Point Theory of Well-Being: Negative Results and Consequent Revisions
Published in
Social Indicators Research, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11205-007-9134-2
Authors

Bruce Headey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 34%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Philosophy 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#699
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,543
of 68,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.