| Title |
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Does Neuroimaging Support the DSM-5 Proposal for a Symptom Dyad? A Systematic Review of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-011-1360-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Pina-Camacho, Sonia Villero, David Fraguas, Leticia Boada, Joost Janssen, Francisco J. Navas-Sánchez, Maria Mayoral, Cloe Llorente, Celso Arango, Mara Parellada |
| Abstract |
A systematic review of 208 studies comprising functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging data in patients with 'autism spectrum disorder' (ASD) was conducted, in order to determine whether these data support the forthcoming DSM-5 proposal of a social communication and behavioral symptom dyad. Studies consistently reported abnormal function and structure of fronto-temporal and limbic networks with social and pragmatic language deficits, of temporo-parieto-occipital networks with syntactic-semantic language deficits, and of fronto-striato-cerebellar networks with repetitive behaviors and restricted interests in ASD patients. Therefore, this review partially supports the DSM-5 proposal for the ASD dyad. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 77 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,854,645
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,118
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,239
of 132,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.