↓ Skip to main content

The role of phenotype in gene discovery in the whole genome sequencing era

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The role of phenotype in gene discovery in the whole genome sequencing era
Published in
Human Genetics, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00439-012-1191-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Almasy

Abstract

As whole genome sequence becomes a routine component of gene discovery studies in humans, we will have an exhaustive catalog of genetic variation and the challenge becomes understanding the phenotypic consequences of these variants. Statistical genetic methods and analytical approaches that are concerned with optimizing phenotypes for gene discovery for complex traits offer two general categories of advantages. They may increase power to localize genes of interest and also aid in interpreting associations between genetic variants and disease outcomes by suggesting potential mechanisms and pathways through which genes may affect outcomes. Such phenotype optimization approaches include use of allied phenotypes such as symptoms or ages of onset to reduce genetic heterogeneity within a set of cases, study of quantitative risk factors or endophenotypes, joint analyses of related phenotypes, and derivation of new phenotypes designed to extract independent measures underlying the correlations among a set of related phenotypes through approaches such as principal components. New opportunities are also presented by technological advances that permit efficient collection of hundreds or thousands of phenotypes on an individual, including phenotypes more proximal to the level of gene action such as levels of gene expression, microRNAs, or metabolic and proteomic profiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,246,403
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,531
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,726
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.