↓ Skip to main content

Granulocyte‐Colony Stimulating Factor (G‐CSF) as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granulocyte‐Colony Stimulating Factor (G‐CSF) as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004400.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen C Cheng, Dianne P Stephens, Bart J Currie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,300
of 87,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.