↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Basis of Botanical Medicine as Alternative Remedies for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Scientific Basis of Botanical Medicine as Alternative Remedies for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12016-012-8329-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy L. H. Yang, Terry C. T. Or, Marco H. K. Ho, Allan S. Y. Lau

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune inflammatory disorder that causes permanent disability and mortality to approximately 1 to 100 people in the world. Patients with RA not only suffer from pain, stiffness, swelling, and loss of function in their joints, but also have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and lymphoma. Typically prescribed medications, including pain-relieving drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, can help to relieve pain, reduce inflammation and slow the course of disease progression in RA patients. However, the general effectiveness of the drugs has been far from satisfactory. Other therapeutic modalities like TNF-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors and interleukin-1 receptor antagonists targeting precise pathways within the immune system are expensive and may be associated with serious side effects. Recently, botanical medicines have become popular as alternative remedies as they are believed to be efficacious, safe and have over a thousand years experience in treating patients. In this review, we will summarize recent evidence for pharmacological effects of herbs including Black cohosh, Angelica sinensis, Licorice, Tripterygium wilfordii, Centella asiatica, and Urtica dioica. Scientific research has demonstrated that these herbs have strong anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic effects. A wide range of phytochemicals including phenolic acids, phenylpropanoid ester, triterpene glycosides, phthalide, flavonoids, triterpenoid saponin, diterpene and triterpene have been isolated and demonstrated to be responsible for the biological effects of the herbs. Understanding the mechanisms of action of the herbs may provide new treatment opportunities for RA patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,570,497
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#262
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,287
of 168,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.