↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in Energy Metabolism During Exercise and Heat Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Alterations in Energy Metabolism During Exercise and Heat Stress
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200131010-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Febbraio

Abstract

Much of the research that has examined the interaction between metabolism and exercise has been conducted in comfortable ambient conditions. It is clear, however, that environmental temperature, particularly extreme heat, is a major practical issue one must consider when examining muscle energy metabolism. When exercise is conducted in very high ambient temperatures, the gradient for heat dissipation is significantly reduced which results in changes to thermoregulatory mechanisms designed to promote body heat loss. This can ultimately impact upon hormonal and metabolic responses to exercise which act to alter substrate utilisation. In general, the literature examining metabolic responses to exercise and heat stress has demonstrated a shift towards increased carbohydrate use and decreased fat use. Although glucose production appears to be augmented during exercise in the heat, glucose disposal and utilisation appears to be unaltered. In contrast, glycogen use has been consistently demonstrated to be augmented during exercise in the heat. This increase in glycogenolysis is observed via both aerobic and anaerobic pathways. Although several hypotheses have been proposed as mechanisms for the substrate shift towards greater carbohydrate metabolism during exercise and heat stress, recent work suggests that an augmented sympatho-adrenal response and intramuscular temperature may be responsible for such a phenomenon.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 207 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 96 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 47 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,277
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,380
of 285,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#335
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.