↓ Skip to main content

Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS Precise Point Positioning and its future prospect

Overview of attention for article published in GPS Solutions, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS Precise Point Positioning and its future prospect
Published in
GPS Solutions, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10291-016-0545-x
Authors

Suelynn Choy, Sunil Bisnath, Chris Rizos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 32%
Computer Science 5 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,374,585
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from GPS Solutions
#153
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,668
of 333,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GPS Solutions
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.