| Title |
The Efficacy and Safety of Exogenous Melatonin for Primary Sleep Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0243.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Buscemi, Ben Vandermeer, Nicola Hooton, Rena Pandya, Lisa Tjosvold, Lisa Hartling, Glen Baker, Terry P. Klassen, Sunita Vohra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Poland | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#597,059
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#470
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#716
of 70,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.