↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Spoken Language Treatments for Minimally Verbal Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Spoken Language Treatments for Minimally Verbal Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1583-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhea Paul, Daniel Campbell, Kimberly Gilbert, Ioanna Tsiouri

Abstract

Preschoolers with severe autism and minimal speech were assigned either a discrete trial or a naturalistic language treatment, and parents of all participants also received parent responsiveness training. After 12 weeks, both groups showed comparable improvement in number of spoken words produced, on average. Approximately half the children in each group achieved benchmarks for the first stage of functional spoken language development, as defined by Tager-Flusberg et al. (J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52: 643-652, 2009). Analyses of moderators of treatment suggest that joint attention moderates response to both treatments, and children with better receptive language pre-treatment do better with the naturalistic method, while those with lower receptive language show better response to the discrete trial treatment. The implications of these findings are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 27%
Social Sciences 40 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Linguistics 9 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,244,861
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,544
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,658
of 177,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#31
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.