| Title |
Effect of a wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) drink intervention on markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial function in humans with cardiovascular risk factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-012-0402-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrizia Riso, Dorothy Klimis-Zacas, Cristian Del Bo’, Daniela Martini, Jonica Campolo, Stefano Vendrame, Peter Møller, Steffen Loft, Renata De Maria, Marisa Porrini |
| Abstract |
Wild blueberries (WB) (Vaccinium angustifolium) are rich sources of polyphenols, such as flavonols, phenolic acids and anthocyanins (ACNs), reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular and degenerative diseases. This study investigated the effect of regular consumption of a WB or a placebo (PL) drink on markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial function in subjects with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Japan | 2 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#338,700
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#103
of 2,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,502
of 170,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.