You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemical phase separation strategies towards silica monoliths with hierarchical porosity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical Society Reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c3cs35345a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christos Triantafillidis, Michael S. Elsaesser, Nicola Hüsing |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 34% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 57 | 52% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 15 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Energy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Society Reviews
#2,273
of 4,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,910
of 210,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Society Reviews
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.