↓ Skip to main content

High temperature and temperature variation undermine future disease susceptibility in a population of the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
High temperature and temperature variation undermine future disease susceptibility in a population of the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus
Published in
The Science of Nature, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00114-016-1373-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Pamminger, Thomas Steier, Simon Tragust

Abstract

Environmental temperature and temperature variation can have strong effects on the outcome of host-parasite interactions. Whilst such effects have been reported for different host systems, long-term consequences of pre-infection temperatures on host susceptibility and immunity remain understudied. Here, we show that experiencing both a biologically relevant increase in temperature and temperature variation undermines future disease susceptibility of the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus when challenged with a pathogen under a constant temperature regime. In light of the economic and ecological importance of many social insects, our results emphasise the necessity to take the hosts' temperature history into account when studying host-parasite interactions under both natural and laboratory conditions, especially in the face of global change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 59%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,209,129
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#749
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,404
of 336,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.