↓ Skip to main content

炭化物を含有する胎土の土偶

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association), May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
炭化物を含有する胎土の土偶
Published in
Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association), May 2007
DOI 10.11215/nihonkokogaku1994.14.89
Authors

宮内 信雄, 吉田 邦夫, 菅沼 亘, 宮尾 亨

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#46
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,736
of 86,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.