You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ロールズのメリトクラシー批判—機会の平等論の転換に向けて—
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11555/kyoiku.82.1_36 |
| Authors |
児島 博紀 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,505,666
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#13
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,957
of 312,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.