↓ Skip to main content

Southern Ocean diversity: new paradigms from molecular ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Southern Ocean diversity: new paradigms from molecular ecology
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Louise Allcock, Jan M. Strugnell

Abstract

Southern Ocean biodiversity reflects past climate, oceanographic, and tectonic changes. Molecular data from contemporary populations carry signatures of these processes. Here, we review new molecular studies on Southern Ocean benthic fauna. Many of these studies focus on species with extensive geographic or bathymetric distributions, and resolve taxonomic questions. Reviewing all available data, we show that, in addition to reflecting life-history characteristics, the molecular signals found in these studies provide an insight into how species survived the last glacial maximum (LGM). We identify molecular signatures that are characteristic of surviving glacial cycles in small refugia on the continental shelf and distinguish them from molecular signatures that are indicative of surviving glacial cycles in the deep sea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 221 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 22%
Student > Master 43 17%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 11 4%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 53%
Environmental Science 33 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 34 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#2,250
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,229
of 177,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.