↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Factors for Morbimortality in Sleeve Gastrectomy. The Importance of the Learning Curve. A Spanish-Portuguese Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic Factors for Morbimortality in Sleeve Gastrectomy. The Importance of the Learning Curve. A Spanish-Portuguese Multicenter Study
Published in
Obesity Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2229-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Sánchez-Santos, Ricard Corcelles Codina, Ramon Vilallonga Puy, Salvadora Delgado Rivilla, Jose Vicente Ferrer Valls, Javier Foncillas Corvinos, Carlos Masdevall Noguera, Maria Socas Macias, Pedro Gomes, Carmen Balague Ponz, Jorge De Tomas Palacios, Sergio Ortiz Sebastian, Andres Sanchez-Pernaute, Jose Julian puche Pla, Daniel Del Castillo Dejardin, Julen Abasolo Vega, Ester Mans Muntwyler, Ana Garcia Navarro, Carlos Duran Escribano, Norberto Cassinello Fernández, Nieves Perez Climent, Jose Antonio Gracia Solanas, Francisca Garcia-Moreno Nisa, Alberto Hernández Matias, Victor Valentí Azcarate, Jose Eduardo Perez Folques, Inmaculada Navarro Garcia, Eduardo Dominguez-Adame Lanuza, Sagrario Martinez Cortijo, Jesus González Fernández

Abstract

Complications in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can cast a shadow over the technique's good results and compromise its safety. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications, and especially those that can potentially be modified to improve safety. A retrospective multicenter cohort study was carried out, involving the participation of 29 hospitals. Data was collected on demographic variables, associated comorbidities, technical modifications, the surgeon's experience, and postoperative morbimortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out on risk factors (RFs) for the complications of leak/fistula, hemoperitoneum, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and death. The following data were collected for 2882 patients: age, 43.85 ± 11.6. 32.9 % male; BMI 47.22 ± 8.79; 46.2 % hypertensive; 29.2 % diabetes2; 18.2 % smokers; bougie calibre ≥40 F 11.1 %; complications 11.7 % (2.8 % leaks, 2.7 % hemoperitoneum, 1.1 % pneumonia, 0.2 % pulmonary embolism); and death 0.6 %. RFs for complications were as follows: surgeon's experience < 20 patients, OR 1.72 (1.32-2.25); experience > 100 patients, OR 0.78 (0.69-0.87); DM2, OR1.48(1.12-1.95); probe > 40 F, OR 0.613 (0.429-0.876). Leak RFs were the following: smoking, OR1.93 (1.1-3.41); surgeon's experience < 20 patients, OR 2.4 (1.46-4.16); experience of 20-50 patients, OR 2.5 (1.3-4.86); experience >100 patients, OR 0.265 (0.11-0.63); distance to pylorus > 4 cm, OR 0.510 (0.29-0.91). RFs for death were as follows: smoking, OR 8.64 (2.63-28.34); DM2, OR 3.25 (1.1-9.99); distance to pylorus < 5 cm, OR 6.62 (1.63-27.02). The safety of SG may be compromised by nonmodifiable factors such as age >65, patient comorbidities (DM2, hypertension), and prior treatment with anticoagulants, as well as by modifiable factors such as smoking, bougie size <40 F, distance to the pylorus <4 cm, and the surgeon's experience (<50-100 cases).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,926,955
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#340
of 3,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,824
of 334,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.