↓ Skip to main content

Disturbances of Agency and Ownership in Schizophrenia: An Auditory Verbal Event Related Potentials Study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Disturbances of Agency and Ownership in Schizophrenia: An Auditory Verbal Event Related Potentials Study
Published in
Brain Topography, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10548-016-0495-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Bühler, Jochen Kindler, Rahel C. Schneider, Werner Strik, Thomas Dierks, Daniela Hubl, Thomas Koenig

Abstract

A 'sense of self' is essentially the ability to distinguish between self-generated and external stimuli. It consists of at least two very basic senses: a sense of agency and a sense of ownership. Disturbances seem to provide a basic deficit in many psychiatric diseases. The aim of our study was to manipulate those qualities separately in 28 patients with schizophrenia (14 auditory hallucinators and 14 non-hallucinators) and 28 healthy controls (HC) and to investigate the effects on the topographies and the power of the event-related potential (ERP). We performed a 76-channel EEG while the participants performed the task as in our previous paper. We computed ERPs and difference maps for the conditions and compared the amount of agency and ownership between the HC and the patients. Furthermore, we compared the global field power and the topographies of these effects. Our data showed effects of agency and ownership in the healthy controls and the hallucinator group and to a lesser degree in the non-hallucinator group. We found a reduction of the N100 during the presence of agency, and a bilateral temporal negativity related to the presence of ownership. For the agency effects, we found significant differences between HC and the patients. Contrary to the expectations, our findings were more pronounced in non-hallucinators, suggesting a more profoundly disturbed sense of agency compared to hallucinators. A contemporary increase of global field power in both patient groups indicates a compensatory recruitment of other mechanisms not normally associated with the processing of agency and ownership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 30%
Neuroscience 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,459,684
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#359
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,952
of 333,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.