↓ Skip to main content

偏見と差別について

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
偏見と差別について
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 1986
DOI 10.2490/jjrm1963.23.43
Authors

なだ いなだ

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 43%
Psychology 2 29%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,343,527
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#5
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,032
of 42,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.